Tragonis wrote:
Aren't you the one to preach don't post of stuff you don't know about? I deleted and went back to guardians before the other guys joined the guardians. I deleted because for the first time ever, adepts where in a good state. And I only had a few months play time left on Heldorian before he aged died, and I wanted to play him as a main for his last days. I deleted so I would not be considered playing both sides, and hogging loot on Gussow.
#1) It was a typo. It was supposed with him not them.
#2) Nice being defensive. I played Thalis and Malias side by side and never had a problem hoarding loot. It's just you as a person, bub, not circumstance.
#3) Doesn't change the fact its a player-based, ooc originated choice.
Quote:
I still think the old necros where much more powerful, why? Because you had summon that did not lag you, heinous pets that would rip folks apart. You could easy march through cities, because bounty hunters did not exist, and when they did they where garbage. No ethereal spawning bounty hunter NPCs, no guardians to gank. You cannot just consider the necromancer, but also his environment. Considering everything, the old necro was grossly overpowered.
.<----
Well, sure, but so were warlocks, sorcs, scouts, and every other class that could brandish a staff and have pets. The bottom line is: necros NOW need to be returned to what they were. Back then they were overpowered as a product of the environment, not the class itself. Perhaps I should have made myself a bit more clear.